Saturday, December 12, 2009
AT&T versus Verizon: Apples and oranges?
Verizon has been slamming AT&T in its television commercials with claims that AT&T's third-generation wireless network offers far less coverage than Verizon's. The Verizon coverage map for the United States certainly looks a lot more comprehensive than AT&T's. But now, AT&T is responding with ads showing another, much more flattering map of its coverage (and the actor Luke Wilson running down a long list of the cities that the map includes). The AT&T commercials, however, do not specify that the coverage is on a third-generation network; it looks as though AT&T's claims may rest on its garden-variety mobile phone network. Is AT&T really countering Verizon's ads in such a disingenuous way? Wait for the next round to find out.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment